Friday, 9 January 2015

Charlie Hebdo incident - Psyop ‘s summary of bullshit psyop:

1. 10 people were supposed to have died with others injured. Yet at the scene, a max of 2 ambulances showed up when well over 10 would have been needed for such an event.

2. It looks like they did fire some real rounds from the looks of one of the police cars for this “drill”, however the pictures are not clear enough to show if the bullet holes are just gangsta stickers, in one of the photos the police officers are laughing and joking next to the shot up car where someone supposedly died.

Additionally, images on Google of shot up windshields have cracks going all through the windshield. In this France event, all damage is limited to where the holes are. Is that possible?

3. All people who responded to the scene had French Foreign Legion haircuts.

Odd for ambulance drivers and EMT’s.

4 (a good one) – If the perpetrators got away and have not been captured, HOW did the French police identify them within hours when they did not turn up elsewhere? Sort of like the passport on 911 or all those pristine passports from flight MH17. That works.

Gotta have a positive ID on them to “prove” they are “Muslim” and not just the Mossad out on a field trip. Gotta do it when the shock factor is at max. And no one dropped a passport this time, HOW did the police figure it out? TIMES THREE?

5. I never saw any bloody photos from this, not even fake blood, not even from a police officer who was shot by an AK and laying on the sidewalk for 10 seconds before being “shot” a second time, and still no blood. Very odd if this is real.

6. Target was a group of Jews, who belong to a greater whole which stages B.S. terror attacks frequently. That stinks.

7. How did the road miraculously have no traffic? The scene is set up as if staged. It is as if the area was cordoned off prior to the “attack” for a drill, so the “terrorists” simply parked smack dab in the middle of the road because they knew there would be no traffic.

8. How did the attackers know there would be a giant staff meeting with everyone important for the publication present to be shot all at once? A little help from the NSA or what?

9. The publication had serious prior financial trouble, and if it was going to close anyway, why not use it to stage a psy op? That would “explain” why it closed, would it not?

10. There is no recoil on the AK as it shoots. I initially assumed blanks, but what about rubber bullets?
At any rate, there was no sign of blood at any point from the police officer, an AK goes all the way through and bullet proof vests are for handguns, not AK rounds. If he was wearing one it would not work. LACK OF ANY RECOIL AT ALL SCREAMS BLANK.

11: All video initially posted was shot from rooftops. FOR A SCENE THAT LASTED LESS THAN A MINUTE. How did anyone get up to the roof that fast to get video of this, times several people shooting from different places?

The roof tops were just regular roof tops with no reason for anyone to be up there. It is not like there was a roof top Starbucks or something. Why were people up there to begin with, how did they figure out what was going on and have their cell phones all ready to shoot video from perfect angles from start to finish?

ANSWER: They went up ahead of time, got in position, and shot video of a drill they knew would happen. It is the only rational answer. Even if they were a roofing crew, they would not have figured out something was going on and had camera phones (times several) shooting clear video in under 15 seconds to capture this less than a minute long event.

The staged camera angles and time frame alone nails this as a fraud, such timing and positioning is flatly impossible. Even the robot android DATA from Star Trek could not have gotten up to the roof that fast, found where to shoot the best video from and captured this so well.

12: Getaway driver was in school at the time of the “incident”

"Classmates stand up for him
The classmates of an 18-year-old suspect in the Paris shooting, that occurred yesterday afternoon at the offices of Charlie Hebdo magazine, have protested his innocence by saying that he was in class at the time of the incident in which 12 people were murdered.
Hamyd Mourad was reported to have handed himself to the police at around 11pm last night after he saw his name mentioned on the news and his friends and acquaintances have said that he has an alibi, as they claim he was present in the classrooms that day."

It won’t matter, just like the Boston bombing, where dorm room mates said Tsnarev was not at the bombing scene when it happened. Once they name a patsy, he is TOAST.

What an innocent dupe Hamyd was for turning himself in expecting the system to be just when running a Jewish scam! Gitmo time!

Definitive proof they use blanks:

Many people have analyzed the police officer shooting video very carefully, and have noticed something I missed, but they do not know what it is. I do. Something flies out of the gun and flits around behind the police officer’s head.

Shills have said it is obviously a skull fragment. But that would not happen with no blood, and there is a far better explanation which when put along with the rest of the scene proves beyond all doubt they were shooting blanks.

A blank round has a paper wad where the bullet would be to hold the powder in place. When fired, this paper wad comes out of the gun and goes nowhere, it stalls near the barrel and flits around for a while. This mystery object many have made note of is simply the paper wad from the blank.